The Future of Social Security: What a Second Trump Term or a Harris Administration Could Mean for Retirees

Social Security is a lifeline for millions of Americans, providing essential income for retirees, disabled individuals, and surviving family members. As the 2024 election draws closer, the future of Social Security has emerged as a key issue. The stark differences between a potential second Trump administration and a Harris administration could determine whether Social Security remains robust and sustainable—or faces deep cuts and potential privatization.

 Trump’s Record and Agenda: A Threat to Social Security?

During his first term, Donald Trump repeatedly suggested that he was committed to preserving Social Security. However, his administration’s policies and proposals tell a different story. Trump’s budget proposals consistently sought to cut spending on Social Security Disability Insurance (SSDI) and Medicare, framing these as ways to reduce government debt. In August 2020, Trump temporarily suspended payroll taxes during the COVID-19 pandemic and signaled that he would seek to permanently eliminate the payroll tax if re-elected—a move that alarmed economists and Social Security advocates.

How it Works

Social Security is primarily funded by payroll taxes, which workers and employers pay into throughout their careers. The elimination or reduction of these taxes would dramatically undermine the program’s funding, potentially leading to benefit cuts or even insolvency over time. Despite Trump’s claims that he would “protect” Social Security, such moves cast serious doubt on the long-term viability of the program under his leadership.

Beware Agenda 47 

As part of his “Agenda 47” platform for a second term, Trump has made vague promises about improving retirement security. However, specific details on how he would protect Social Security are notably absent. Critics argue that his previous actions suggest a willingness to jeopardize the program’s future for the sake of immediate tax cuts and deficit reduction. Some worry that Trump’s re-election could embolden Republicans in Congress to pursue their long-held goal of privatizing or restructuring Social Security—potentially putting benefits at risk for current and future retirees.

 Harris’ Approach: Protecting and Expanding Social Security

Kamala Harris, on the other hand, has positioned herself as a staunch defender of Social Security. As a senator, Harris co-sponsored legislation aimed at expanding Social Security benefits and ensuring its solvency for decades to come. The “Social Security Expansion Act,” which she supported, proposes increasing benefits across the board, lifting the income cap on payroll taxes to ensure that high earners contribute more, and making cost-of-living adjustments more reflective of retirees’ actual expenses.

Protection Under Harris

Harris has repeatedly emphasized that protecting Social Security is a matter of economic justice, particularly for marginalized communities. She has pointed out that women, people of color, and low-income workers disproportionately rely on Social Security in retirement due to systemic inequalities throughout their working lives. Under a Harris administration, Social Security would not only be protected from cuts but would likely be expanded to provide greater support for retirees and other beneficiaries.

Moreover, Harris has strongly opposed efforts to privatize Social Security or reduce its funding through payroll tax cuts. Her platform explicitly rejects any cuts to Social Security or Medicare, viewing them as non-negotiable safety nets that should be strengthened rather than weakened.

 A Stark Choice for Retirees and Future Beneficiaries

The 2024 election presents a clear choice when it comes to the future of Social Security. On one side is Donald Trump, whose track record and proposals suggest a willingness to undermine the program’s funding through payroll tax cuts and budgetary pressures. While Trump may claim he would protect Social Security, his history raises significant concerns about potential cuts, benefit reductions, or even moves toward privatization.

On the other side is Kamala Harris, who has consistently advocated for expanding and strengthening Social Security. Her policy proposals align with a vision of ensuring that Social Security remains a reliable source of income for all Americans, particularly the most vulnerable. By lifting the income cap on payroll taxes and rejecting cuts, Harris aims to secure the program’s solvency for generations to come.

 The Bottom Line: The Future of Retirement Security Is on the Ballot

For millions of retirees and those planning for their future, the 2024 election could have profound consequences. A second Trump administration raises the risk of destabilizing Social Security through tax cuts and potential restructuring, while a Harris administration would focus on preserving and enhancing the program. Voters will ultimately decide which vision they believe best safeguards their financial security in retirement.

Expats on a fixed income may have the most to lose. There is a significant number of US citizens that live in Yucatan Mexico. Many of them survive on retirement thanks to Social Security and Medicare. Without these programs in place, a small but steady income would present a problem for most people without a monetary backup plan. Think how a Trump outcome may affect you and your family.

Follow Democrats Abroad's Yucatan Chapter on Facebook!