November 18, 2024

Taxation Task Force's Response to IRS Comment on Form 8621 Passive Foreign Investment Companies


Below is a copy of the submission the Democrats Abroad Global Taxation Task Force submitted to the Internal Revenue Service for the public comment period on Form 8621 Passive Foreign Investment Companies.

Click here to download a pdf of DA's submission to the IRS in full.

 

Dear Mr. Garcia,

Democrats Abroad appreciates the opportunity to comment on the Information Collection Request (“ICR”) submitted by the Internal Revenue Service (the “Agency”, “IRS”) for renewal of Form 8621, the Information Return by a Shareholder of a Passive Foreign Investment Company (“PFIC”). As the largest Americans abroad organization in the world, with hundreds of thousands of U.S. citizen members living outside the United States, we can provide firsthand insight into how Form 8621 Information Collection poses an undue burden, is applied more broadly than necessary or reasonable, and results in disparate access to financial services based solely on where a U.S. citizen lives. 

Although this Information Collection Request (ICR) is not directed towards individual taxpayers, we are commenting on this ICR on behalf of individual taxpayers to raise awareness of the very real burden and impact on individuals. The only other opportunity for individuals to comment on this form would be in the omnibus 1545-0074 ICR filing (related to Form 1040) – where the individual burden imposed by this form is “averaged out” and any comments on Form 8621 would be too specific for the broad nature of that information collection. We hope that the burden on individual international taxpayers will be considered in this ICR process, as they are an underserved community recognized by both the Agency and its watchdog, the Taxpayer Advocate Service. 

The impacts of this Information Collection are severe, resulting in:

  • Substantial tax preparation costs that are disproportionate to taxes ultimately owed;
  • A practical inability to make safe and responsible investments such as those available to middle-class Americans living in the United States;
  • A major life choice between not saving for the future, falling out of tax compliance, or relinquishing citizenship to address what is commonly perceived as an otherwise unsolvable issue. 

In Appendix A we provide comment on the specific questions posed in the Federal Register Notice. We summarize our major concerns here:

  • IRS regulatory guidance and taxpayer education efforts around Form 8621 are lacking. Form 8621  is mentioned nowhere in IRS Publication 54, the authoritative guide for International Taxpayers, nor are the form’s instructions in line with the reading comprehension levels of the average taxpayer. 
  • The burden placed on individual taxpayers is, in absolute terms, as large as the burden on non-individual taxpayers, but the former have less expertise and financial means to complete the form. Curiously, the burden on individuals is omitted from both this ICR and the omnibus 1545-0074 ICR that it is supposedly aggregated into. 
  • A discrepancy of how many people file Form 8621 and the time estimate required to file the form.

Within the context of the Paperwork Reduction Act (“PRA”) and ICR, we request that the IRS:

  1. Provide accessible educational materials for individual international taxpayers that describe whether commonly encountered financial products like foreign ETFs and mutual funds are PFICs, and what the taxpayer must do if they own one; 
  2. Publish instructions for Form 8621 that are understandable to non-professionals with an average level of reading and financial literacy; 
  3. Provide an automated tool for calculating and e-filing Form 8621.

We further propose, outside the specific context of the PRA, that the IRS undertake rulemaking to provide regulatory relief to individual taxpayers, which could include any or all of the following measures:

  • Broadening de-minimis rules to apply a less burdensome calculation and reporting method for distributions below a certain threshold;
  • Broadening eligibility for QEF status to automatically include distributing-class ETFs and Mutual Funds that are regulated in a secretary-approved jurisdiction and for which clear dividend and cost-basis information is available via either the fund or brokerage;
  • Exempting international taxpayers holding approved classes of foreign investments, domiciled in approved jurisdictions, from PFIC reporting, and instead applying the standard capital gains and dividend tax regimes; 
  • Not requiring Form 8621 reporting in cases where no tax is due and the asset’s value is already subject to reporting on Form 8938 and via automatic institutional reporting under a FATCA IGA. 

It is desirable, from the perspective of both American competitiveness and preventing an undue burden to the public, that all Americans be able to save for retirement and their general self-sufficiency. The application of the PFIC regime to Americans living abroad interferes with this, and we believe that a serious paperwork reduction and regulatory relief effort should be made to address this unintended barrier to saving and investing by international taxpayers. 

Thank you for your consideration of our comments. 

Sincerely,

Martha McDevitt-Pugh
International Chair
Democrats Abroad
[email protected]

Rebecca Lammers
Chair, Taxation Task Force
Democrats Abroad
[email protected]